It is a noninvasive method with no assumption of the chest wall’s number of degrees of freedom, does not require the use of a mouthpiece, nose clip or any device attached to the subject under evaluation and presents a relatively simple calibration procedure without the use of respiratory maneuvers requiring cooperation (Aliverti and Pedotti, 2003). This instrument has been used in different positions and under experimental conditions, including physical LY294002 clinical trial exercise (Parreira et al., 2012). The validity of OEP to measure chest wall volume changes has been evaluated in different

populations and experimental protocols (Vogiatzis et al., 2005 and Layton et al., 2013). However, to our knowledge, this is the first paper to actually investigate the reliability of this instrument. In this

context, the aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the OEP system in healthy subjects at rest and during exercise on a cycle ergometer. This was a methodological study conducted in a research laboratory. Healthy subjects of both sexes were Enzalutamide chemical structure recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: age between 20 and 30 years; body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.99 kg/m2; no smoking history; no flu symptoms in the previous four Tolmetin weeks; normal lung function according to predicted values (Pereira et al., 2007); no apparent thoracic wall deformities; no reported heart diseases or neuromuscular disorders; and no orthopedic diseases that could negatively influence physical exercise performance. The exclusion criteria were inability to understand and/or perform research procedures. The study was approved

by the Institution Ethics Committee (ETIC 0258.0.203.000-10), and subjects gave informed consent. Initially, subjects’ weight and height were measured using a calibrated scale (Filizola ind. Ltda, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Subsequently, a lung function test was performed with a calibrated spirometer (Vitalograph 2010, Buckingham, England) according to the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society. Data collection was performed on two occasions separated by at least 48 h within a 2-week period following the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians for exercise testing (ATS/ACCP, 2003). Subjects were instructed not to perform physical activity 12 h before the tests (Neder et al., 1999). The subjects’ first and second assessments were conducted at the same period of the day.