“
“Objectives: This study tested the following null hypotheses: (1) there is no difference in resin-dentine bond strength when an experimental glutaraldehyde primer solution is added prior to bonding procedures and (2) there is no difference in resin-dentine bond strength when experimental glutaraldehyde/adhesive system is applied under dry or wet demineralized dentine conditions.\n\nMethods: Extracted human maxillary third

molars were selected. Flat, mid-coronal dentine was exposed for bonding and four groups were formed. Two groups were designated for the dry and two for the wet dentine technique: DRY: (1) AZD8186 manufacturer Group GD: acid etching + glutaraldehyde primer (primer A) + HEMA/ethanol primer (primer B)-under dried dentine + unfilled resin; (2) Group D: the same as GD, except for primer A application; WET: (3) Group GW: the same as GD, but primer B was applied under wet find protocol dentine condition; (4) Group W: the same as GW, except for primer A application. The bonding resin was light-cured and a resin core was built up on the adhesive

layer. Teeth were then prepared for microtensile bond testing to evaluate bond strength. The data obtained were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = 0.05).\n\nResults: Glutaraldehyde primer application significantly improved resin-dentine bond strength. No significant difference was observed when the same experimental adhesive system was applied under either dry or wet dentine conditions. These results allow the first null hypothesis to be rejected and the second to be accepted.\n\nConclusion: Glutaraldehyde may affect demineralized dentine properties selleck chemicals leading to improved resin bonding to wet and dry substrates. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“BackgroundEndoscopic features corresponding to pathological findings in the

Sydney System have not been identified, and endoscopic diagnosis of chronic gastritis has not yet been established. To establish the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection in gastric mucosa by endoscopic features, a prospective multicenter study was carried out. Patients and MethodsTwo hundred and ninety-seven registered patients from 24 facilities between March 2008 and February 2009 were enrolled. Association between endoscopic findings (conventional findings and indigocarmine contrast (IC) method findings) and diagnosis of H.pylori infection made by microscopic observation of biopsy specimens was investigated in the corpus and antrum and their diagnostic accuracies were investigated. ResultsTwo hundred and seventy-five patients were analyzed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for H.pylori infection of conventional endoscopy was 0.811 in thecorpus and 0.707 in the antrum (P=0.006).