Thirty non-trained panellists evaluated the samples using a 9-point hedonic scale (Stone & Sidel, 1993), with 1 = “disliked

extremely” and 9 = “liked extremely” for the acceptance tests. Panellists www.selleckchem.com/products/Sunitinib-Malate-(Sutent).html evaluated the samples in individual cabins, under a white light. Six samples were presented monadically. The attributes evaluated were: crust colour, crumb colour, crust appearance, crumb appearance, aroma, taste and texture. Panellists also expressed their purchase intention through a 5-point scale that varied from 1 = “would certainly not buy” to 5 = “would certainly buy”. Positive purchase intention was calculated as the percentage of panellist who attributed scores from 4 to 5. A profile of the panellists was obtained, regarding fibre-enriched bread consumption frequency. Bread quality during storage was evaluated through moisture analysis on days 1, 4 and 7 after baking. Crumb moisture was determined in triplicate through AACC Method 44-40.01 (AACC, 2010). The responses obtained for the assays carried out according to the central composite rotational design (CCRD) used to study the effects of the independent variables (WB, RS and LBG) were analysed using the Statistica 5.0 software (Statsoft PR-171 order Inc., Tulsa, USA), permitting analysis through the Response Surface Methodology, according to Rodrigues

and Iemma (2005). The responses or dependent variables were the process parameters (high-speed mixing time and proofing time) and the bread quality characteristics (specific volume, crumb instrumental colour through L*, C* and h, sensory analysis through the acceptance and purchase intention tests and moisture during storage). When mathematical models were obtained to explain these responses, they must be used with coded values for the independent variables, where: WB = coded Vasopressin Receptor value (−α to +α) of concentration of wheat bran; RS = coded value (−α to +α) of concentration of resistant starch; LBG = coded value (−α to +α) of concentration of

locust bean gum; Fcalc = calculated F; Ftab = tabled F. High-speed mixing times necessary to reach maximum gluten network development for each of the experimental design assay doughs varied between 1.32 min and 3.18 min. This variation could be due to the variation of the quantity and type of fibre present, which directly affected the amount of water added to the dough and the form this water was absorbed or left available for the development of the gluten network. The increase of viscosity can also be one of the factors involved in the modification of high-speed mixing time. A mathematical model to describe the behaviour of high-speed mixing time as a function of the quantity of the different dietary fibre sources added, within the ranges studied, was obtained (Equation (3)).