91 ± 0.10 3.21 ± 0.15 3.63 ± 0.19* 3.01 ± 0.16 3.25 ± 0.16 3.52 ± 0.22* VCO 2 (L · min -1 ) 2.64 ± 0.07 2.79 ± 0.12 3.11 ± 0.17* 2.72 ± 0.13 2.87 ± 0.15 3.10 ± 0.19* RER 0.91 ± 0.01 0.87 ± 0.01 0.86 ± 0.01† 0.90 ± 0.01 0.88 ± 0.01 0.88 ± 0.01† HR (beats · min -1 ) 138.5 ± 6.7 Kinase Inhibitor Library 158.9 ± 5.4 172.6 ± 4.9* 151.4 ± 5.9 162.0 ± 5.4 173.1 ± 4.4*

RPE 12.6 ± 0.3 15.0 ± 0.5 17.8 ± 0.6* 12.4 ± 0.5 15.1 ± 0.5 17.9 ± 0.4* *p < 0.05 main effect of time; † p < 0.05 main effect of trial X time. Subjects finished the exercise trial at a mean RPE of >17 (Table 2), suggesting that the combination of the heat and exercise was www.selleckchem.com/products/z-ietd-fmk.html perceptually difficult. RER was lower by the end of the 1 hr exercise bout during P compared to CHO trial (significant trial × time interaction, p = 0.017), demonstrating a greater reliance on fat by the end of the P trial (Table 2). There was not a significant effect of exercise (p = 0.5) or trial (p = 0.18) on absolute carbohydrate oxidation (Figure 1A). Absolute

www.selleckchem.com/products/CP-690550.html fat oxidation was not different between trials (p = 0.10), but did show a significant increase (p = 0.02) in fat use by the end of their 1 hr bout of cycling (Figure 1B). Figure 1 Substrate oxidation during exercise in the heat. A. represents carbohydrate oxidation for 1 hr in the heat with gas measurements made at 4, 24, and 54 min. B. represents fat oxidation for 1 hr in the heat with gas measurements made at 4, 24, and 54 min. Open and solid symbols represent the P and Sinomenine CHO trials respectively. * – indicates a significant main effect of time. Muscle Glycogen Muscle glycogen did not differ

between trials (p = 0.57), but decreased as a result of the exercise bout (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). This represents a 35% and 44% reduction pre and post exercise for the CHO and P trial respectively. Muscle glycogen did not significantly increase from post exercise to 3 hr of recovery in either trial. Figure 2 Muscle glycogen concentration pre, post-exercise and following 3 hr of recovery. Open and solid bars represent the P and CHO trials respectively. * – indicates a significant main effect of time. Gene Expression There was not a significant effect of exercise in the heat on our housekeeping gene, GAPDH (p = 0.3). Metabolic and mitochondrial gene expression from the pre and 3 hr post exercise muscle samples using the 2-ΔΔCT method is presented in Figure 3. There was a significant effect for exercise on GLUT4 mRNA (P = 0.04), increasing 20% and 27% in the CHO and P trial respectively. GLUT4 expression was not altered by CHO treatment. Exercise increased PGC-1α (P < 0.001) 8 and 9.5 fold in the CHO and P trial respectively, but did not show a significant effect of treatment (P = 0.15). MFN2 did not change with exercise in the heat or carbohydrate supplementation. There was a significant effect of exercise (P < 0.001) and interaction (CHO × exercise) for UCP3 (P = 0.