For each round, analysis

for consensus will be conducted for the entire panel, and also for participant stratifications of the panel (e.g., paramedics, physicians, EMS managers, etc.). Response rates for each round will be reported, as well as descriptive statistics of the participant demographics. Integration of Findings To achieve the objectives of the Canadian National EMS Research Agenda a mixed methods approach will be used. This approach of collecting both qualitative and quantitative data to answer one research question is growing in popularity among researchers and funding agencies [15]. An essential component of mixed methods studies is effective integration of data; otherwise the project Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical is essentially two independent studies of the same topic [16]. In this project, each phase of the study will inform the next stage, and the Angiogenesis inhibitor results will be integrated using triangulation,

a process that contributes to the validity of the results [17]. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical During the design phase of this study, the study team established that the topic must be explored qualitatively, to learn more of the barriers and opportunities to Canadian EMS research Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical – a previously unstudied topic. The qualitative data will be analyzed, and the results will then inform the roundtable discussion. The topics discussed during the roundtable will be entered into the quantitative Delphi consensus survey, which will then be analyzed. Data from all phases of the study will then be triangulated by two investigators (JJ and KD) [17]. The triangulation will consist of the following steps, performed independently by each researcher: Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical sorting (reviewing the results and identifying prevalent themes in both the qualitative interviews and the consensus survey), convergence coding

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical (was there full agreement, partial agreement, silence (i.e., one set of results addresses a theme, but it does not appear in the other set of results), or dissonance between each set of results), and comparison of triangulation findings between each researcher [17]. The final step of the triangulation protocol is providing feedback of the triangulation results to the study team. Through this process, convergent themes that too appear to be important in both sets of results, silent themes and dissonant themes are identified. This information will allow the investigators to gain a greater understanding of the results and the research topic. The final report will include the results of the qualitative findings from the baseline interviews, quantitative results from the roundtable and Delphi consensus survey, and the results of the triangulation exercise. The integration of these results will form the Canadian EMS Research Agenda. Knowledge Translation Plan Graham et al (2006) coined the term ‘knowledge to action’ to describe the meaning and components of the knowledge translation process [18].