It is the first model that has been calibrated to the total Dutch AZD7762 purchase population, using nationwide incidence rates for hip fracture and mortality rates. Despite some limitations [19, 52], its strengths make the Dutch FRAX tool a good candidate for implementation into clinical practice. Conflicts of interest Arief Lalmohamed, Anthonius de Boer, and Frank de Vries work at a division that received unrestricted funding for pharmacoepidemiological research from GlaxoSmithKline, the private–public-funded Top Institute Pharma (www.​tipharma.​nl,

includes co-funding from universities, government, and industry), the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, and the Dutch Ministry of Health. John Kanis, Helena Johansson, Johannes Jacobs, and Willem Lems have no competing interests with regard to this work. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License

which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. References 1. Poole KE, Compston JE (2006) Osteoporosis and its management. BMJ 333:1251–1256PubMedCrossRef 2. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767PubMedCrossRef 3. Morrison RS, Chassin MR, Siu AL (1998) The medical consultant’s role in caring for patients with hip fracture. Ann Intern Med 128:1010–1020PubMed 4. Wolinsky FD, Fitzgerald JF, Stump TE (1997) The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study. Am J Public Health 87:398–403PubMedCrossRef 5. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX Bioactive Compound Library mouse and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397PubMedCrossRef 6. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and

osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–SN-38 ic50 1046PubMedCrossRef 7. Johansson H, Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Oden A, Devogelaer JP, Kaufman JM et al (2010) A FRAX(R) model for the assessment of fracture probability in Belgium. Osteoporos Int 22:453–461PubMedCrossRef 8. Bouter LM, van Dongen MCJM, Methamphetamine Zielhuis GA (2005) Epidemiologisch onderzoek, 5th edn. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Nederland, p 41 9. de Bruin A, Ariel A, Verweij G, Israëls A (2009) Methode van bijschatten van StatLinetabel Ziekenhuispatiënten naar diagnose. Statistics Netherlands (CBS), Den Haag 10. Verdel BM, Souverein PC, Egberts TC, van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, de Vries F (2010) Use of antidepressant drugs and risk of osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fractures. Bone 47:604–609PubMedCrossRef 11. Pouwels S, van Staa TP, Egberts AC, Leufkens HG, Cooper C, de Vries F (2009) Antipsychotic use and the risk of hip/femur fracture: a population-based case–control study. Osteoporos Int 20:1499–1506PubMedCrossRef 12.