Two hundred sixty-six patients were recruited. The LAEP was completed in a short time, perceived as easy to complete, and there was no relevant information missing. Ceiling/floor effects were negligible. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84) and test-retest reliability (ICC =
0.81) were satisfactory. LAEP scores consistently correlated with QOLIE-31 (r = 0.71) and HADS (r = 0.52-0.63) scores. When the LAEP was used to discriminate between patients with and without adverse events, the scores on the QOLIE and HADS corresponded. The Spanish version of the LAEP scale exhibits adequate psychometric properties, suggesting that it is an appropriate instrument to measure adverse events among Spanish-speaking patients with epilepsy. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.”
“Study Design. Descriptive
questionnaire selleck kinase inhibitor study.
Objective. This preliminary study was undertaken to try and develop an understanding of the factors that may affect recovery in aircrew with musculoskeletal disabilities.
Summary of Background Data. Clinical recovery from musculoskeletal disabilities is generally achieved after the patient undergoes definitive therapy and rehabilitation. However, a proportion of patients may continue to suffer from morbidity and pain long after clinical and radiological finality has been reached. In these cases, psychosocial factors may have played a contributory role. There has been no research documenting or studying such factors in aviation and pilots in particular.
Methods. The study was carried out at the Department of Human Engineering from 2004 ZD1839 purchase to 2006. A detailed questionnaire was designed to elicit basic clinical details and psychosocial factors at work and home.
Results. A total of 57 male aircrew participated voluntarily in this study. Of these, 41 (71.9%) achieved normal recovery, whereas
in the remaining 16 (28.1%), recovery was considered delayed. The mean age of aircrew in the normal recovery group (33.1 +/- 4.6 years) was slightly higher than those in the delayed group (31.0 +/- 3.2 years). All the aircrew who had delayed recovery www.selleckchem.com/products/PD-0325901.html had a spinal disability, whereas spinal disabilities constituted only 46.3% in the normal recovery group. Of the spinal disabilities in aircrew with delayed recovery, 12 had low backache. Aircraft accidents and ejection accounted for almost one-fifth of the total disabilities (n = 11, 21.9%). The respondents identified multiple sources of emotional support viz., friends, family, and parents.
Conclusion. A hypothetical model is proposed that possibly explains to some extent the role of psychosocial factors affecting recovery in aircrew with musculoskeletal disabilities. Further research in psychological and emotional consequences of trauma, in particular ejection and the best means/timings to address these, is recommended.