While the discussions below apply to every potential dialysis patient regardless of age, in practice most ‘younger’ patients (below 70) are likely to be offered dialysis; these considerations below become far more relevant for discussions with patients who are over 70 years old with stage 4 or 5 end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We are therefore looking at
three potential pathways for patients with ESKD: Not for dialysis or transplantation – a clear decision based on medical and ethical grounds incorporating the patient’s wishes. For dialysis or transplantation. Indeterminate – that group for whom Selleck BMS-777607 the treating nephrologist and the patient are unable to come to a clear decision. For people in this group, seeking a second opinion and ideally, discussing the case at a multidisciplinary team meeting (similar to those discussions surrounding acceptance onto the transplant waiting list) are paths to follow. A very important principle is that these planning discussions need to take place early in the course of a patient’s
management, probably when estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) reaches 25 mL/min. There are some key principles that can help nephrologists, patients and their families click here make these decisions: Nephrologists need to lead these discussions – these are very difficult discussions but it is imperative that as nephrologists we do not shy away from them as this is to the ultimate detriment of the patient and their
family. In some centres it may be that nephrologists do not see the same patients regularly and the temptation here will be either to use dialysis as the default choice for all patients or else to leave these discussions to other medical or nursing staff. It is inappropriate for these discussions to be delegated to more junior medical staff but advanced trainees and Junior Medical Officers (JMOs) should be present as part of their training. Initial discussions are generally best if done with the nephrologist and his/her medical team, and then followed by more detailed discussions with nursing staff and allied health staff. Ideally a renal supportive care (RSC) programme Reverse transcriptase team will help facilitate these ongoing discussions with a patient and their family when a conservative not-for-dialysis pathway is chosen and a pre-dialysis team will assist those for whom dialysis is considered the correct management pathway. Many nephrologists have already made it part of their usual practice to offer a ‘non-dialysis’ pathway to selected patients but many are also understandably troubled when making such decisions. This issue has become more prominent because of the increasing number of aged patients with comorbidities, frailty, or poor functional status who present with end stage kidney disease, for whom decisions need be made as to the appropriateness of dialysis.